Trading psychology is the set of habits, biases and emotional reactions that sit between your strategy and your results. Two traders can run the same system and end the year in completely different places, because one follows the rules on a bad Tuesday and the other does not. Most account damage comes not from a lack of information but from decisions made when bored, frustrated, overconfident or chasing a loss.
This guide is built around four short videos from Gianluca Pizzituti, Co-Founder and CEO of Velotrade, who has spent more than 25 years trading institutionally and privately, including at a bank in London and building algorithmic strategies in Singapore. Each section covers one idea he keeps coming back to: why a profitable trade can be a bad trade, why most traders trade too much, why sometimes the best trade is no trade, and why you should always ask who is on the other side.
Highlights of this article
- Trading psychology is about process, not prediction: you control your decisions, not the outcome of any single trade
- A profitable trade and a good trade are different things; rewarding a rule break with a win is how outcome bias takes hold
- Overtrading is the most common psychological leak, and the industry around you is paid for your volume, not your profitability
- Knowing when not to trade is a skill: walking away from a bad day protects both capital and judgement
- Short-term trading is close to zero-sum before costs, so every profit comes from someone who may be better prepared than you
- A simple routine (written rules, a journal, a weekly review) plus hard external limits turns good intentions into consistent behaviour
Ready to get funded?
Trade up to $200,000 in firm capital with static drawdown, no consistency rule, and payouts within 24 hours. Pass the challenge and keep up to 90% of your profits.
What trading psychology actually means
A practical definition: trading psychology is the gap between what your plan says you should do and what you actually do. Fear, greed and boredom matter only because they widen that gap.
The usual symptoms are overtrading, revenge trading after a loss, moving stops once a trade goes against you, and overconfidence after a winning streak. None of these is solved by a better indicator. They are solved by structure: clear rules, a record of what you did, and limits that do not move when you feel strongly about something. That is the thread running through Gianluca's videos.
The most dangerous win: profitable trade vs good trade
2:24Read the transcript
The trade that made you money might be the one that ruins you. Stay with me on this.
I am Gianluca Pizzituti, CEO of Velotrade. I've been trading for over 25 years, and I want to talk about the most dangerous winning trade.
Picture this. Your strategy is clear. Every rule you follow is screaming the same thing: do not enter. There is no signal. There is no setup. Nothing lines up.
And you enter anyway. Call it a feeling, call it boredom, call it whatever you like. And then it works. The trade runs in your favor and you make money. Feels great, doesn't it?
It shouldn't. Because that win just taught you the worst lesson of your entire career.
Here is what most traders never understand. A profitable trade and a good trade are two completely different things. When you make money on a trade you should never have taken, your brain does not file it under luck. It files it under skill.
You start believing you are smarter than your own system. You start thinking the rules are for everybody else. And that belief is poison.
Because the next time your gut speaks up, you listen. And the time after that. Until one day the market comes to collect. And when it collects, it takes back everything those reckless trades gave you, and then it takes more.
So here is the test I apply to every single trade. If someone sat me down and asked me why I entered, and I could not give a clear answer, something is fundamentally wrong.
And notice I said nothing about whether it won or lost. That part does not matter. If you cannot explain why you entered, it was a bad trade. Full stop.
Because a win you cannot explain is a win you cannot repeat. And trading is nothing but repetition. If you cannot do it again tomorrow for the same reason, you do not have a strategy. You have a coin flip that happened to land your way.
So the next time you break your own rules and get rewarded for it, do not celebrate. Worry. That is the market setting a trap, and you just walked straight into it.
Gianluca describes a scene most traders will recognise. Your strategy is clear, and every rule you follow is telling you not to enter. There is no signal, no setup, nothing lines up. You enter anyway, out of boredom or a hunch. And the trade works.
"That win just taught you the worst lesson of your entire career," he says. The reason is outcome bias. When a trade you should never have taken makes money, your brain does not file it under luck. It files it under skill. You start believing you are smarter than your own system, and that the rules are for everybody else. The next time your gut speaks up, you listen, and the time after that, until the market eventually takes back what those reckless trades made, and more.
The test Gianluca applies to every trade
His filter: if someone asked why he entered, could he give a clear answer? Notice that it says nothing about whether the trade won or lost. "If you cannot explain why you entered, it was a bad trade. Full stop."
The logic is about repetition. A win you cannot explain is a win you cannot repeat, and trading is a repetitive activity. If you cannot do the same thing again tomorrow for the same reason, you do not have a strategy. In his words, you have "a coin flip that happened to land your way."
Separating decision quality from outcome
A useful way to internalise this is a two-by-two grid. Every trade falls into one of four boxes:
| Followed the plan | Broke the plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Made money | Good trade, good outcome. Repeat it. | Bad trade, lucky outcome. The dangerous one. |
| Lost money | Good trade, bad outcome. Accept it, it is the cost of doing business. | Bad trade, deserved outcome. Learn from it. |
Most traders only feel bad about the bottom row. The top-right box is the one that does lasting damage, because it feels like a reward. Gianluca's advice is to treat it as a warning: "Do not celebrate. Worry."
Losing trades that followed the plan are not mistakes. Any strategy with an edge still loses a share of its trades, and your risk-reward ratio decides whether those losses are affordable.
Overtrading: why you are probably trading too much
3:00Read the transcript
Here is something nobody in this industry will ever tell you. You are trading too much, and it is quietly killing your account.
I am Gianluca Pizzituti, CEO of Velotrade. I've been trading for over 25 years, institutionally and privately. And what I'm about to say goes against almost everything you've been sold.
Open any feed and it is the same message on repeat. You can trade, you can become a trader, you can make money, you can build a career out of this. And look, all of that can be true. I'm not here to crush the dream. But there is a part of the story nobody mentions.
The whole machine is built to make you trade more. Not better. More.
Think about who is on the other side of all the noise. Every exchange, every broker, every platform wants one thing from you: volume. The more you trade, the more rebates they collect, the more fees they earn, the more VIP tiers and badges they dangle in front of you to keep you clicking.
Their business does not run on whether you are profitable. It runs on how often you press the button. Your activity is their revenue. Read that again. They are not incentivized for you to win. They are incentivized for you to trade.
And here is the quiet truth underneath it all. The more you trade, the more mistakes you make. It is simple math. Every extra trade is another chance to get it wrong.
And then there is the statistic almost nobody in this space wants to put on a billboard. Depending on the study you read, somewhere around 9 out of 10 day traders lose money over time. 9 out of 10. 90%.
So ask yourself an honest question. Why do you want to go against those odds? Why fight the statistics when the statistics are screaming at you? I am not saying this to discourage you. I am saying it because somebody finally should.
So here is my advice, and it is the opposite of what the industry feeds you. Trade less. Think carefully before you enter. Take a position with a real thesis and hold it.
Stop living on the five-minute chart, refreshing every candle, hunting for the next click. I have been there. I've done exactly that. And I can tell you with confidence that the vast majority of people are going to lose money. That is not me being harsh. That is the data nobody wants to repeat.
So be honest with me. How many trades did you take last week? Drop it in the comments. I read them.
If outcome bias is the most dangerous psychological trap, overtrading is the most common one. Gianluca's view goes against most of what traders see online. The message on every feed is that you can trade, become a trader and build a career. He does not dismiss that, but he points to the part nobody mentions: "The whole machine is built to make you trade more. Not better, more."
Who benefits from your activity
Exchanges, brokers and trading platforms typically earn from activity: commissions, spreads, fees and rebates. VIP tiers, badges and notifications keep you pressing the button. "Your activity is their revenue," Gianluca says. "They are not incentivized for you to win. They are incentivized for you to trade." That does not make every platform your enemy, but the environment is designed to pull you towards frequency.
More trades, more mistakes
The second argument is arithmetic. Every extra trade is another chance to get something wrong, and each one pays a spread or commission whether it works or not. Several broker disclosures and academic studies have found that a large majority of retail day traders lose money over time, and the traders who trade most frequently tend to fare worst.
Gianluca's advice is the opposite of what the industry feeds you:
- Trade less, and think carefully before you enter
- Take positions with a real thesis, and give that thesis time to play out
- Stop living on the five-minute chart, refreshing every candle and hunting for the next click
He admits he has been there himself. The fix is not willpower in the moment but deciding in advance how many trades, how much risk and which setups you will accept, then counting. If you do not know how many trades you took last week, start there.

Non-trading is trading: knowing when to walk away
1:01Read the transcript
Sometimes non-trading is the best trade you can take. When trading becomes tough, when the day's P&L is not looking good, there is no need to stay at the desk.
Just go out, enjoy the sun, go for a walk, clear your mind. This is the best way for you to come back fresh and start again with a clear head.
Trading is about discipline and consistency. So sometimes you need to be disciplined enough not to take any trade. That's the best way forward.
The traders who keep their accounts alive for longer are those who understand not only when to trade, but also when not to trade. So for me, today, stay off, go out, enjoy the sun and take it from there. See you guys.
In this one-minute clip Gianluca makes a point that sounds obvious and is rarely practised: "Sometimes non-trading is the best trade you can take."
When the P&L is red, the instinct is to stay at the desk and fight back, exactly when judgement is weakest. His advice is to get up, go for a walk, clear your mind and come back fresh. Trading, as he puts it, is about discipline and consistency, and sometimes discipline means not taking any trade at all.
"The traders who keep their accounts alive for longer are those who understand not only when to trade, but also when not to trade," he says.
Practical stop rules
Knowing when not to trade works best when the decision is made before the bad day arrives. Common examples: a personal daily loss cap set well inside any external limit, a rule to stop after two or three consecutive losses, and no trading when tired, angry or distracted. Each one moves the decision to stop out of the heat of the moment and into a calm planning session.
Who is on the other side of your trade
3:27Read the transcript
You just made $1,000 on a trade. Congratulations! Now, answer one simple question. Where did that $1,000 come from?
I am Gianluca Pizzituti, CEO of Velotrade. I've been trading for over 25 years, institutionally and privately. And the day you properly understand what I'm about to explain is the day you become a much humbler trader.
When we talk about short-term trading, especially in derivatives, your profit does not appear out of thin air. If you make $1,000, somebody else, or several participants collectively, has taken the corresponding economic loss.
And when you lose $1,000, that value has gone to somebody else. It might be another trader, it might be an institution, it might be spread across many different positions. The identity does not matter. What matters is that every trade has another side, before costs.
That is the basic logic of a zero-sum game. After fees, spreads and slippage, it becomes even harder, because the participants collectively have less money left.
Once you understand that, trading suddenly looks very different. You are not pressing buttons against an empty screen. You are competing with people who may have spent five, ten or twenty years developing their skills. They have studied, they have made mistakes, they have lost money, they have built systems.
And now you arrive with six months of experience and believe the market will hand you the money on a silver platter. Why would it? Nobody gives money away easily. If you want to take value from somebody else, you need to bring skills, preparation and discipline to the table.
This is why I do not believe the fantasy you see online: trade for two hours, spend the rest of the day on the beach and become a millionaire. Can somebody trade for two hours a day? Of course! But those two hours may sit on top of ten or twenty years of work.
The person on the other side may have spent the whole day researching, preparing and waiting for exactly that opportunity. The two hours you see are not the whole story. They are the visible result of the years you did not see.
Think about your own profession. Think about the skills you use every day. Could somebody arrive tomorrow with no experience and perform at your level immediately? Obviously not!
You worked for it, you made mistakes, you earned that experience. Trading is exactly the same. You can become successful, but you cannot skip the learning process. The market does not care how confident you feel. It only exposes what you actually know.
So next time you make money, ask yourself who was on the other side. And next time you lose, remember that somebody else was better positioned for that moment.
That thought should not discourage you. It should humble you. And humility is where real improvement begins.
Before this video, had you ever genuinely asked where your trading profit came from? Yes or no? Drop it in the comments.
The last video asks a question Gianluca believes makes traders more humble: you just made $1,000 on a trade, so where did that $1,000 come from?
In short-term trading, especially in derivatives, profits do not appear out of thin air. If you make money, someone else, or several participants collectively, has taken the corresponding loss. When you lose, that value has gone to someone else. It might be another trader or an institution, or it might be spread across many positions. The identity does not matter. What matters is that every trade has another side, before costs. After fees, spreads and slippage, the participants collectively have even less left, so the game becomes harder than zero-sum.
You are competing with professionals
"You are not pressing buttons against an empty screen," Gianluca says. You are competing with people who may have spent five, ten or twenty years building their skills and systems. Arriving with six months of experience and expecting the market to hand you money is not realistic.
This is also why he does not believe the online fantasy of trading for two hours a day and spending the rest on the beach. Those two hours may sit on top of years of work. He has seen the gap between theory and reality first-hand, including an algorithmic strategy of his own that did not behave as designed (see what algorithmic trading is for how systematic approaches are built and where they break).
Humility as a performance tool
As in any profession, you can become successful, but you cannot skip the learning process. "The market does not care how confident you feel. It only exposes what you actually know."
His suggestion: the next time you make money, ask who was on the other side. The next time you lose, remember that someone else was better positioned for that moment. That thought should not discourage you, he says. It should humble you, "and humility is where real improvement begins." For a longer view of what that learning path looks like, see how to become a trader.
Process over results: building a routine that holds up
Each of the four videos points to the same conclusion: results are noisy, process is controllable. A routine is how you turn that idea into behaviour. It does not need to be elaborate.
1. Write your rules down
Before the session, your plan should answer a handful of questions in writing:
- Which markets and setups do I trade, and which do I ignore?
- What is my maximum risk per trade and per day?
- How do I enter and exit (for example, whether you use limit orders or market orders and why)?
- How many trades am I allowed today?
- What makes me stop for the day?
A trade outside the written rules is the top-right box of the grid waiting to happen.
2. Keep a trading journal
A journal is the only reliable defence against outcome bias, because it records why you entered, not just what happened. For every trade, note:
| Field | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Setup and reason for entry | Passes Gianluca's "can you explain it?" test |
| Planned risk and target | Shows whether your sizing matched the plan |
| Followed the rules? (yes/no) | Separates decision quality from outcome |
| Emotional state before entry | Reveals boredom, revenge or overconfidence patterns |
| Result | Recorded last, deliberately |
3. Review weekly, not trade by trade
Looking at each result in isolation invites emotional reactions. A weekly review looks at patterns instead: how many trades broke the rules, what those trades did overall, and whether you took more trades than planned. Over a few months the journal tells you more about your edge, and your leaks, than any single trade can.

Hard limits as an external discipline system
Personal rules are only as strong as the moment you are most tempted to break them. External limits help because they cannot be renegotiated mid-session.
A simulated prop evaluation is one example of this structure. On Velotrade, every challenge has a daily loss limit and a static maximum drawdown, both set out on the rules page. The daily loss limit resets each day at 00:30 UTC, and the maximum drawdown is a fixed dollar floor from your starting balance that does not move for the life of the simulated account. Breaching either one ends the evaluation, whether the cause was a bad thesis or a revenge trade.
That structure caps the damage of a bad day, exactly when overtrading and revenge trading happen, and makes the cost of breaking your own rules concrete. The most common reasons traders do not pass are psychological rather than technical, which is covered in detail in why traders fail prop challenges.
The most effective approach is to set your personal limits tighter than any external one. If the daily loss limit is 5%, a personal stop at 2% or 3% means the hard limit is a backstop you never reach, not a target you trade towards.
Ready to trade with $200,000 capital?
Explore challengesFrequently Asked Questions
About the author

Gianluca Pizzituti
Chief Executive Officer
Formerly on the derivatives desk at Dresdner Kleinwort in London, then founded and ran a proprietary HFT firm in FX and equity indices out of Singapore.
View author page



