Take Profit Trader and Velotrade both fund traders fast and pay quickly, but they are built for different markets and different drawdown models. Take Profit Trader is a CME futures firm with a simple one-step evaluation and genuine day-one payouts, trading index, energy, and metals contracts within session hours. Velotrade is a crypto-native, multi-asset firm that runs 24/7 with a static drawdown that never trails. Both are well liked; the question is which structure matches how you actually trade.
The decision usually comes down to one detail most comparisons skip: the loss floor. At Take Profit Trader the evaluation uses a forgiving end-of-day drawdown, but the funded PRO account switches to intraday trailing that moves with your unrealized profit. At Velotrade the floor is fixed from your starting balance and never moves against you.
Quick answer: Take Profit Trader is a CME futures firm with a one-step evaluation, a 6% profit target, and day-one payouts, but its funded PRO account switches from the evaluation's end-of-day drawdown to an intraday trailing drawdown. Velotrade is a crypto-first, multi-asset firm trading 24/7 with a static drawdown that never trails, no consistency rule, and no maximum risk per trade. Neither is strictly better; pick futures and day-one payouts, or 24/7 markets and a predictable floor.
Highlights of this article
- Take Profit Trader funds CME futures only within session hours; Velotrade funds crypto and multi-asset 24/7
- Take Profit Trader's evaluation drawdown is end-of-day but switches to intraday trailing when funded; Velotrade's static drawdown never trails on either
- Velotrade has no consistency rule and no maximum risk per trade; Take Profit Trader applies a 50% consistency rule in the evaluation
- Both pay fast: Take Profit Trader has genuine day-one payouts at 80% (90% on PRO+); Velotrade applies up to 90% from your first payout
- Take Profit Trader has the longer track record (since 2021, ~4.4 on Trustpilot across 9,000-plus reviews); Velotrade launched in 2026
- Take Profit Trader runs on Tradovate and NinjaTrader; Velotrade runs on DXtrade only
Quick Comparison: Take Profit Trader vs Velotrade
| Take Profit Trader | Velotrade | |
|---|---|---|
| Markets | CME futures only (index, energy, metals, micros) | Crypto-first; forex, stocks, indices, commodities |
| Trading hours | CME session hours, no overnight or weekend holding | 24/7, weekend holding allowed |
| Drawdown model | End-of-day in evaluation, intraday trailing on funded PRO | Static, fixed from starting balance, never trails |
| Consistency rule | 50% during the evaluation | None |
| Profit split | 80% PRO, up to 90% PRO+ | Up to 90% from day 1 |
| Payouts | Day-one payouts, $250 minimum | Fast payouts, up to 90% |
| Platforms | Tradovate, NinjaTrader | DXtrade only |
| Track record | Since 2021, ~4.4 Trustpilot (9,000+ reviews) | Since 2026 |
Markets and Hours: CME Futures vs 24/7 Crypto
Take Profit Trader funds futures traders only. You trade CME contracts (index, energy, metals, and micro futures) through the Tradovate and NinjaTrader ecosystem, within session hours. There is no crypto, forex, or stock offering, and the model is built around intraday futures rather than overnight or weekend positions.
Velotrade is the structural opposite: crypto-native and multi-asset, funding crypto, forex, stocks, indices, and commodities, and the crypto market it is built for never closes. Weekend holding is allowed by default and there is no forced session close.
If you are a dedicated CME day trader who flattens before the close, session hours are no limitation and Take Profit Trader fits naturally. If you trade crypto or want markets that run through the weekend, Velotrade is designed for that. See where each sits in the best futures prop firm roundup and the wider top prop firms in 2026 list.
Drawdown: The EOD-to-Intraday Switch vs Static
This is the most important difference between the two firms, and worth understanding in full before you buy either.
At Take Profit Trader, the evaluation uses an end-of-day trailing drawdown: your loss limit is recalculated only at each daily close based on your highest end-of-day balance, so intraday swings do not move it. That is why the evaluation feels forgiving. The catch is that once you pass and trade a funded PRO account, the drawdown switches to intraday trailing, tracking your peak balance in real time including unrealized profit and trailing upward as an open trade moves in your favor. If a trade runs in your favor and then reverses, your floor may have already moved up by that unrealized gain, so a pullback that leaves you flat on the day can still breach the account. Traders who passed under the easier model often blow the funded account on this stricter one. The PRO+ upgrade returns to an end-of-day drawdown, which is why experienced traders push toward it. This is a documented mechanic, not a hidden trap, but it is the single detail you must plan around. For the full explanation, see end-of-day trailing versus tick-by-tick drawdown.
Velotrade takes a different approach. It uses a static maximum drawdown: the floor is fixed from your starting balance and never trails, in the evaluation or the funded account. A favorable move can never raise your loss limit against you, so the number you start with is the number you manage against for the life of the account. There is also no consistency rule and no maximum risk per trade.
Neither model is universally better. Take Profit Trader's end-of-day evaluation drawdown is genuinely forgiving while you qualify, and disciplined traders manage the funded intraday version every day. But if a predictable floor that never moves is what you value most, Velotrade's static model is the more forgiving structure.

Profit Split and Payouts
Both firms are strong here, and payout speed is a real point in Take Profit Trader's favor. It pays an 80% split on PRO accounts and up to 90% on PRO+, and its headline feature is genuine: payouts can begin on day one, with same-day or next-day funding cited repeatedly in reviews and a $250 minimum withdrawal. On a standard PRO account you first clear a buffer (the balance must reach the account size plus the maximum drawdown) before withdrawing at the full split; PRO+ removes that buffer and pays from day one at 90%.
Velotrade applies up to 90% from your first payout with no tier to climb and no buffer, so it reaches the top rate sooner. Both firms deliver on fast, proven payouts, and the split ceiling is similar once you account for the PRO+ path.
Fees and Resets
Take Profit Trader bills its evaluation as a monthly subscription that renews every 30 days until you pass, so a slow evaluation costs more than a fast one. A failed Test does not force a fresh purchase: you can reset the account for a fee (around $100, confirm current terms) rather than buying a new one, and the firm frequently runs discounts and activation-fee waivers. Model your odds first with the challenge pass calculator.
Velotrade charges a one-time challenge fee rather than a recurring subscription, so no clock adds cost while you work through the evaluation, though the fee is not refunded on passing. In short, Take Profit Trader's subscription is cheap if you pass quickly and adds up if you do not, while Velotrade's fee is a fixed known cost.
Platforms
Take Profit Trader runs on Tradovate and NinjaTrader, the standard futures platforms, so if you already trade CME contracts you can keep a familiar setup and your existing charting and order tools. Velotrade runs exclusively on DXtrade, whose single-platform focus keeps the rule set consistent across every asset it offers. Match the platform to the markets you actually intend to trade.
Track Record and Background
Take Profit Trader's longer history is a real point in its favor. It has operated since 2021 and holds a Trustpilot rating of about 4.4 out of 5 across more than 9,000 reviews, one of the larger review bases in the futures prop category. The recurring praise is fast, reliable payouts and clear rules; the recurring complaint is not about honesty but about the drawdown switch on the funded PRO account, a mechanic to plan around rather than a reason to distrust the firm. For the deeper profile, see the Take Profit Trader review.
Velotrade's counterpoint is a crypto-native rule set and a documented institutional team background, paired with a newer 2026 launch that has less accumulated public payout history. Take Profit Trader leads on operating history and verified payouts; Velotrade leads on 24/7 rules and a drawdown that never trails.
What Each Firm Suits Best
Choose Velotrade if:
- You trade crypto or multi-asset and want 24/7 markets with weekend holding
- You want a static drawdown that never trails, plus no consistency rule and no maximum risk per trade
- You are comfortable on DXtrade and prefer a one-time fee over a subscription
Choose Take Profit Trader if:
- You are a dedicated CME futures day trader who wants genuine day-one payouts and a verified track record
- You can manage an intraday trailing drawdown on the funded account, or will use PRO+
- You prefer Tradovate or NinjaTrader and can pass the evaluation quickly
Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Neither is strictly better; they are built for different traders. Take Profit Trader wins for CME futures day traders who want a simple one-step test, no daily loss limit in the evaluation, and some of the most verified day-one payouts in the category, provided they manage the funded account's intraday trailing drawdown. Velotrade wins for traders who want 24/7 crypto and multi-asset markets, a static drawdown that never moves against them, no consistency rule, and no maximum risk per trade. Decide on the markets and drawdown model you actually trade, and verify the current terms directly with each firm before purchasing.
What does passing actually pay you?
Plug in your account size and see your profit target, max drawdown, and first payout - before you commit to a challenge.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the author

Vittorio De Angelis
Executive Chairman
Former equity-derivatives trader at JP Morgan, Dresdner Kleinwort and Bank of America in London. Later Head of Brokerage at a global broker in Hong Kong.
View author page


