Notional value is the total market value of a leveraged position, not the money you put up to open it. On a funded account it is the number that actually drives your risk: it decides how fast a price move moves your equity, how close you sit to your daily loss limit, and how quickly you can breach a drawdown rule. Most traders watch their margin and ignore notional value. That is the wrong way around.
Highlights of this article
- Notional value is position size multiplied by the current price, the full economic exposure of a trade
- It is not the same as margin: margin is the deposit, notional value is the position the deposit controls
- Leverage is just the ratio between the two: notional value divided by margin
- On a funded account, notional value decides how a price move hits your drawdown and daily loss limits, not the margin you posted
- Controlling notional value, not chasing leverage, is what keeps funded traders inside the rules
What is notional value?
Notional value is the total value of the asset your position controls, measured at the current market price. The formula is simple:
Notional value = position size × current price
If you buy 2 BTC at $60,000, the notional value is $120,000. That is your real exposure to Bitcoin. It does not matter that you only posted a few thousand dollars in margin to open it. A 1% move in BTC changes your profit and loss by 1% of $120,000, which is $1,200, regardless of how small the margin was.
This is the core idea every funded trader needs: your gains and losses scale with notional value, not with the cash you deposited. The deposit only determines whether the broker lets you open the position. The notional value determines what happens to your account after that.
Notional value vs margin
Margin and notional value are constantly confused, and the confusion is what blows up funded accounts. They measure two different things.
- Margin is the deposit the platform locks to open and hold the position. It is a fraction of the full value.
- Notional value is the full economic size of the position the margin controls.
A trader who posts $1,000 of margin to control a $20,000 position has a notional value of $20,000 and is using 20x leverage. If the asset drops 5%, the loss is 5% of $20,000, which is $1,000. That single move wipes out the entire margin. The trader was never risking $1,000 of exposure. They were risking $20,000 of exposure with a $1,000 buffer.
On a funded account, this matters even more, because the loss is measured against the firm's drawdown and daily loss rules, not against your personal margin.
How leverage connects margin and notional value
Leverage is not a separate input. It is the relationship between the two numbers above:
Leverage = notional value ÷ margin
So notional value can also be written as:
Notional value = margin × leverage
This is why two traders with the same account balance can carry completely different risk. The one running 10x has ten times the notional exposure of the one running 1x, even though both posted the same margin. The leverage number on the screen is just telling you how much notional value each dollar of margin is controlling.

Ready to get funded? Start your challenge →
Why notional value matters on a funded account
Prop firms do not measure your risk by your margin. They measure it by what happens to your account equity, which is driven entirely by notional value.
Here is the chain that ends most challenges:
- A trader sizes a position by margin: "I will only risk $500 of margin."
- They use high leverage, so that $500 of margin controls a large notional value.
- The market moves against them by a few percent.
- The loss, calculated on the large notional value, breaches the daily loss limit or maximum drawdown.
The trader felt safe because the margin was small. The account failed because the notional value was large. Velotrade uses static drawdown, so the floor is fixed from your starting balance, which makes the maths predictable: you can calculate the exact notional value that puts a given price move at your limit, and size below it.
Calculating notional value: worked examples
The table below shows how the same $1,000 of margin produces very different notional exposure and very different dollar risk for a 2% adverse move.
| Margin | Leverage | Notional value | Loss on a 2% move |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | 1x | $1,000 | $20 |
| $1,000 | 5x | $5,000 | $100 |
| $1,000 | 10x | $10,000 | $200 |
| $1,000 | 25x | $25,000 | $500 |
| $1,000 | 50x | $50,000 | $1,000 |
The margin never changes. The risk changes by 50 times across the rows, because the notional value changes by 50 times. A funded trader sizing for a 5% daily loss limit on a $50,000 account has a hard ceiling on total notional value, and every position has to fit under it. This is why experienced funded traders quote their risk in notional value rather than leverage or margin. Leverage describes the tool. Notional value describes the actual exposure on the account.
Notional value in crypto perpetuals vs futures
The concept is identical across instruments, but the contract details differ.
- Crypto perpetual futures quote notional value directly in the base or quote currency. One BTC perpetual at $60,000 carries $60,000 of notional value per contract. Funding payments are also calculated on notional value, not margin.
- Traditional futures use a contract multiplier. An E-mini S&P 500 contract is the index level times $50, so an index at 5,000 gives a notional value of $250,000 per contract. This is why a single index future carries large exposure even at low margin, a key point for anyone trading the best prop firm for futures.
In both cases the rule is the same: read the notional value first, then decide how many contracts fit inside your risk limit.
How to size a position by notional value
The practical skill is working backwards from your risk limit to a maximum notional value, then sizing every position to fit under it. Funded traders who pass evaluations do this before they enter, not after.
Step 1: Find your hard dollar limit. On a $50,000 account with a 5% daily loss limit, the limit is $2,500. Because the drawdown floor is static, this number is fixed, so you can plan around it with confidence instead of recalculating it after every winning day.
Step 2: Decide the move you must survive. Pick the adverse price move you want to withstand before the position hits that limit. A trader who expects 3% swings sizes so a 3% move does not breach the rule.
Step 3: Divide to get your maximum notional value. The limit divided by the survivable move gives the ceiling. $2,500 divided by 3% is about $83,000 of total notional value. Every open position combined has to stay under that number.
Step 4: Convert notional value into position size. Divide the notional ceiling by the asset price. At a BTC price of $60,000, $83,000 of notional value is roughly 1.38 BTC. That is the largest position the rules allow for a 3% stop.
Step 5: Add up open positions. Notional value is additive across the account. Two positions of $40,000 each carry $80,000 of combined exposure and combined risk, even though each looks small on its own. Correlated assets that move together should be treated as a single larger position against the limit.
This is the reverse of how most traders size. They start with a leverage setting and a margin amount, then learn their real exposure only after the market moves against them. Starting from the loss limit and working back to notional value keeps the account inside the rules by design rather than by luck, and the risk management habits that follow from it are what separate funded traders from blown evaluations.
This article is educational and does not constitute financial advice. Trading leveraged products carries significant risk of loss.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the author

Vittorio De Angelis
Executive Chairman
Former equity-derivatives trader at JP Morgan, Dresdner Kleinwort and Bank of America in London. Later Head of Brokerage at a global broker in Hong Kong.
View author page


