Beyond the profit split: the rules that decide whether funded traders get paid
The industry’s decisive terms are rarely on the page where the purchase decision is made. We read the rulebooks at six major firms so you can compare what actually determines a payout.
Topstep · FTMO · FundingPips · Blue Guardian · HyroTrader · Velotrade
A review by Velotrade, one of the six firms compared. Every rule below is drawn from each firm’s own published rules and help-center pages; terms change often, so verify current conditions before you buy.
Most funded accounts are lost to rules, not to bad trades
A trader passes every trade with discipline, hits the profit target, and still loses the funded account, not because the strategy failed but because of a rule buried deep in the evaluation guide. These are the terms that actually decide whether a payout ever arrives.
of traders ever reach a payout, across 300,000+ accounts.
FPFX Tech · 2024 study (via Finance Magnates)
of failures come from hitting loss limits, not from missing profit targets.
hoc-trade, separate 500k-trader study
of profit a single strong day can be capped at under a consistency rule.
4 of 6 firms reviewed apply one
A market booming and breaking at the same time
Demand for funded accounts has gone vertical while the supply of firms was culled. Both trends put the same thing under a spotlight: the terms you agree to at checkout.
Monthly searches climbed from 880 in early 2020 to about 49,500 by 2025, a 56x rise. More first-time buyers are entering an industry whose decisive terms sit off the sales page.
- Feb 2024MetaQuotes pulls the trigger
MT4/MT5 licenses revoked from prop firms serving US clients, cutting off the platform most of the industry ran on.
- Mar 28 2024The Funded Trader
Paused operations, later admitting to $2M+ in denied payouts.
- May 2024True Forex Funds
Closed citing insolvency, leaving ~300 traders with $1.2M outstanding.
- May 2024SurgeTrader
Shut down within days; the CEO conceded ~10% of payout obligations went unpaid.
Where exactly is your failure line?
Every prop account has a maximum-loss line. Firms draw it in fundamentally different ways, and the difference can decide the same trade twice.
The dashed continuation is the fixed-firm account trading on after the trailing-firm account has already closed.
Same account, same trades. The day-7 pullback is ordinary; it bottoms out around $10k above the fixed $90k floor, and the account goes on to finish up about $6.5k. But a trailing floor has ratcheted up to just under the peak, so the very same dip pierces it and closes the account. FTMO anchors its Maximum Loss at 10% of the starting balance; Topstep’s trailing limit rises with end-of-day balance and locks at the start. Neither hides its model, but fixed versus trailing is not a detail, it decides this trade.
Rules, not trades, end most accounts
When a rule can end a funded account, its placement matters. Most live several clicks from the checkout button.
In FPFX Tech’s 2024 study of 300,000+ accounts across 10 firms, only 14% passed a challenge and just 7% ever reached a payout, so roughly half of the traders who pass are still never paid. And in a separate 500,000-trader analysis by hoc-trade, around 70% of failures were loss-limit breaches: accounts ended by a rule, not a losing strategy. (Neither dataset covers the exact six firms compared here.) The three rule categories below decide most of that gap, and each lives several pages from the price.
The penalty for a good day
A consistency rule caps how much of your total profit may come from any single session. Hit the target too fast and the evaluation still isn’t passed.
The rule is widespread and thresholds vary by firm and product. Topstep, FundingPips, Blue Guardian and HyroTrader each apply a version during evaluation or on a payout tier. FTMO applies one too, a 50% Best Day Rule on its 1-Step product, documented in its help center rather than the headline rules, a neat example of where these terms tend to live. The tightest single-day caps sit on the most attractive payout options.
Max risk per trade: the limit nobody mentions
Loss limits end the most accounts, but this is the rule the fewest traders have heard of, and it is the hardest to see coming, because it can penalise or end an account on a trade that never closes at a loss. If you read one section before buying a challenge, read this one.
A hard cap on how much any single position, or trade idea, may lose at any moment, measured on unrealized (floating) profit and loss, not closed trades. It sits beneath the advertised daily loss limit. If an open trade’s paper loss so much as touches the cap intraday, even for a second, even if it recovers and closes in profit, the rule can trigger and the account is finished.
Three things make it dangerous, and all three are easy to miss at checkout:
- It measures unrealized loss. Your trade never has to close red. A brief dip against you, on paper, is enough.
- It can switch on only after funding. Some firms don't apply it during the evaluation at all, so you can pass without ever meeting the rule that then governs your funded account.
- It can aggregate re-entries. Close a losing trade and reopen in the same direction within a short window, and the losses are combined toward the cap.
- Blue Guardian · “Guardian Shield” force-closes trades near 1–2% unrealized (by account type); a first breach cuts the split to 50%, a second closes the account.
- FundingPips · “Risk Per Trade Idea,” funded stage only, aggregates re-entries.
- HyroTrader · mandatory stop-loss within 5 minutes of every trade, monitored live.
None of these mechanisms is illegitimate as risk management on its own. The question is placement: a rule that can end a funded account arguably belongs next to the price, not several pages into a help center.
“Could a trader read our rules once, in one sitting, and know every way their account could end? If the answer is no, the rulebook is not finished. Most of this industry has treated that as a marketing problem. We think it is the entire product.”
Gianluca PizzitutiChief Executive Officer, VelotradeWhat the rulebooks actually say
All six firms across the terms that most often decide a payout, with a source (i) on the named competitor claims. The green column published this report, so read it as a market participant’s position, not a neutral grade, and verify current terms directly.
| Term that decides a payout | FTMO | Topstep | FundingPips | Blue Guardian | HyroTrader | Velotrade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drawdown model | Fixed from initial (10%) | Trailing, end-of-day, locks at start | Varies; one trails 5% from peak | Daily loss + trailing, varies by product | Trailing daily by default; Swing = static | Fixed, from initial balance |
| Consistency rule | 1-Step only (Best Day Rule) | Eval + payout path | Gates top payout tier | Applies in evaluation | Evaluation only | None, any stage |
| Secondary per-trade cap | No secondary cap | Size limits on news | Funded stage only | Guardian Shield 1-2% unrealized | 5-min stop, 3% per trade | None published |
| Rules change after funding | Yes, tighten | Yes, differ | Yes, activate | Yes, funded mechanics | Yes, consistency drops | No, consistent |
| Where the rules are documented | Objectives page + FAQ | Help-center articles | Rules + payout-terms pages | Blog + help center | Terms + FAQ | One published rules page |
Sources: each firm’s own published rules pages, help-center articles and FAQs. Captured Jul 2026; the (i) chips link the exact page and wording.
Captured: July 2026. Terms in this industry change frequently and several firms describe current restrictions as temporary, so verify before you buy.
How rules were classified: a firm is marked as applying a rule only where its own documentation states it; “varies by product” means the answer differs across that firm’s account types.
Disclosure: Velotrade is the sixth firm and published this report. Its column is its own position, not a third-party grade; treat the comparison as a market participant’s analysis.
A comparison written by one of the six firms owes you the other side. Velotrade the operator is not new: the same team has run a licensed invoice-finance business in Hong Kong since 2016, and its founders come from JP Morgan, Bank of America and Dresdner Kleinwort (see the about page). But as a prop firm specifically, these are the places the established names still lead.
Velotrade's prop firm launched in 2026. FTMO (2015) and Topstep (2012) have been running trader evaluations far longer.
Paying out funded traders at scale is something only time proves. On this specific record, Velotrade is early; the incumbents have years of it.
Several firms scale funded accounts well beyond Velotrade's $200k ceiling and support more platforms than DXtrade alone.
A clean rulebook is something a firm can design from day one; a paid-out track record is not. Compare the rules here, and compare track record, payout history and platform choice elsewhere. Both decide whether you get paid.
The ten-minute pre-purchase checklist
The industry’s own attrition data suggests these ten minutes matter more than any comparison of profit splits. Skip the homepage; open the terms.
1Drawdown mechanics
- Fixed from initial balance, or trailing your equity?
- If trailing, end of day or tick by tick intraday?
- At what point does the trailing floor lock permanently?
2Consistency requirements
- Does it apply in evaluation, funded, or both?
- Is it a condition of a specific payout tier?
- Exact single-day % cap, and against what profit pool?
3Per-trade & per-idea caps
- A secondary cap beneath the daily loss limit?
- Does it measure unrealized floating losses?
- Does it aggregate re-entries within a time window?
4Funded-stage changes
- Do rules activate, tighten or disappear once funded?
- Does the funded account start at a reduced balance?
- Do news / weekend permissions change after funding?
5Payout conditions
- Minimum trading days, and how often can you withdraw?
- First-payout waiting period, minimum profit and minimum withdrawal?
- Can a payout be declined at the firm's discretion, and is the fee refunded?
6Where it is written
- Every account-ending rule on a single page?
- Can support point to each rule in writing?
- Can't find it in ten minutes, is that the answer?
Traders aren’t the only ones reading the fine print
Regulators have started asking the same question this report does: is the term that decides a payout disclosed where the buying decision is made?
A CFTC consultation is due
The CFTC is set to open a public consultation on 1 August 2026 (comments close 30 November 2026) on whether challenge fees count as “commodity-pool participation interests,” which would pull evaluation-based US futures prop firms under CFTC and NFA registration.
The FCA and ESMA want the marketing cleaned up
Both have reiterated that prop marketing to retail must carry prominent risk warnings and drop misleading “keep 90%” and “unlimited scaling” performance claims.
Non-refundable fees are the flashpoint
Regulators in Europe, Australia and North America are questioning whether charging a fee without delivering funding resembles a pay-to-play model.
Nothing here is settled law, and several bodies (including CySEC and, for now, ESMA) have signalled prop trading is not an immediate priority. But the direction of travel is toward standardised, upfront disclosure, the same shift most other consumer financial products already made.
The problem isn’t the model. It’s the disclosure.
The prop model isn’t broken; backing skilled traders with firm capital is a sound idea. What’s lagging is disclosure at the point of sale. Comparing rulebooks deserves the same weight traders give to comparing profit splits, arguably more, since the rulebook decides whether the split ever gets paid.
Sources · Finance Magnates, “80–100 Prop Firms Shut Down in 2024” (2025) and reporting on True Forex Funds, The Funded Trader & SurgeTrader closures · FX News Group · Brokeree Solutions Q4 2024 closure study · FPFX Tech analysis of 300,000+ accounts across 100,000 traders and 10 firms (via Finance Magnates) · loss-limit failure share from The Prop Firm Guide 2026 and a 500,000-trader study by hoc-trade · FTMO 2024 revenue via OMHC holding accounts · FTMO Best Day Rule (trading objectives / help center) · Blue Guardian Guardian Shield (help center) · “prop firm” search-volume data, 2020–2025 · The Industry Spread and track360 on CFTC / FCA / ESMA positions · Topstep, FTMO, FundingPips, Blue Guardian, HyroTrader and Velotrade published rules and help-center documentation, mid-2026. This analysis was produced by Velotrade, a market participant, and reflects publicly available information about competitor terms as of the time of writing. Verify current terms directly with each firm before purchasing any evaluation.
The terms that decide a payout
Eight definitions worth knowing before you buy a challenge. The first is the one most traders have never heard of.
Max risk per trade
Most overlookedA cap on how much any single position or trade idea may lose at any moment, measured on unrealized (floating) P&L and sitting beneath the daily loss limit. It can close an account on a trade that never closes at a loss, may switch on only after funding, and may aggregate re-entries. The most overlooked rule in the industry.
Drawdown floor (maximum loss)
The lowest your account balance or equity can reach before the account is closed. How a firm draws and moves this line is the single biggest difference between rulebooks.
Fixed (static) drawdown
A drawdown floor set from your starting balance that never moves, up or down. On a $100k account with a 10% limit, you fail at $90k, and that number never changes.
Trailing drawdown
A floor that rises as your balance grows and never falls back. End-of-day trailing locks to your closing balance; intraday (tick-by-tick) trailing can rise on an unrealized high and close you out on a pullback that finishes green.
Daily loss limit
The most you may lose in a single trading day before the account is suspended or closed, usually measured from your balance at the start of that day.
Consistency rule
A cap on how much of your total profit may come from any single day, commonly 33% to 50%. Exceed it and the outsized day is not counted toward the target or payout.
Unrealized (floating) P&L
The profit or loss on positions that are still open, marked to the current market price. Rules that watch unrealized P&L can trigger before you ever close a trade.
Funded stage
The account you trade after passing the evaluation. Rules can tighten, loosen, or appear for the first time at this stage, so the terms that governed your challenge may not be the ones that govern your money.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about drawdown models, consistency rules, and why funded accounts fail.
Tools and further reading
Put the checklist to work: model your own numbers, then compare the firms on the terms that decide a payout.
Drawdown risk calculator
See your fixed-drawdown floor, daily budget, and how many losing trades you can take before a breach.
Prop challenge profit calculator
Work out what you must earn to pass, and what your first payout looks like on the other side.
Challenge ROI calculator
Is prop trading worth it? Weigh the challenge fee against your break-even month and 12-month net.
Compare prop firms
Filter 15 firms side by side by drawdown model, consistency rule, news trading, and profit split.
Prop firms with no consistency rule
The firms that don't cap your best day, and why that matters for concentrated strategies.
Trailing-drawdown firms
Which firms use an end-of-day trailing floor, the mechanic from Part One of this report.
Prop firm rules explained
A plain-English primer on drawdowns, daily loss limits and how rule enforcement really works.
EOD vs tick-by-tick trailing
The two trailing-drawdown models that share a name and behave very differently.
Read every rule
before you risk a dollar
Up to 90% profit split
Keep most of what you earn
Zero personal risk
Trade with our capital
Instant payouts
Withdraw anytime