Two crypto-only prop firms. Similar account sizes. Very different rules.
Velotrade and HyroTrader both target serious crypto traders who want funded accounts without risking their own capital. But underneath the similar packaging, the evaluation structures diverge in ways that matter — particularly if you trade around news events, run high-conviction single-day positions, or use automated strategies.
This comparison breaks down both firms across every metric that actually affects whether you pass the evaluation and keep your funded account.
Highlights of this article
- Velotrade has no consistency rule at any stage — HyroTrader caps any single day at 40% of total eval profit
- HyroTrader requires a mandatory stop-loss within 5 minutes of every trade, capped at 3% risk per position — Velotrade has no such requirement
- Velotrade requires only 4 qualifying trading days; HyroTrader requires 10 minimum trading days per phase
- Velotrade's 90% profit split applies from the first payout — HyroTrader starts at 70% and scales over 12 months
- Both firms allow news trading, weekend holding, overnight holding, and EAs
- Platform differs: Velotrade uses dxTrader; HyroTrader connects to Binance and ByBit via CLEO
Quick Comparison: HyroTrader vs Velotrade
| Velotrade | HyroTrader | |
|---|---|---|
| Challenge types | 1-Step, 2-Step | 1-Step, 2-Step |
| Account sizes | $5k – $200k | $5k – $200k |
| Phase 1 profit target | 10% | 10% |
| Phase 2 profit target | 5% | 5% |
| Daily loss limit (2-Step) | 5% | 5% |
| Max drawdown (2-Step) | 10% fixed | 10% |
| Min trading days | 4 days | 10 days |
| Consistency rule | None | 40% cap per day (eval only) |
| Mandatory stop-loss | No | Yes — within 5 min, max 3% risk |
| Profit split | Up to 90% from day 1 | 70% → 90% (scales over months) |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
| EAs / automation | Allowed | Allowed |
| Platform | dxTrader | Binance / ByBit via CLEO |
| Challenge fee refund | No | Yes (on first payout) |
Evaluation Rules: Where the Real Differences Are
Consistency Rule
This is the single most important rule difference between the two firms.
HyroTrader enforces a 40% consistency rule during evaluations: no single trading day can account for more than 40% of your total evaluation profit. If you're targeting 10% on a $50,000 account ($5,000), no single day can contribute more than $2,000 to that total.
For most traders this may sound reasonable. But for crypto traders who concentrate capital into high-conviction macro events — Fed decisions, CPI prints, major protocol news — this rule directly limits how you can earn your pass.
Velotrade has no consistency rule. None during the evaluation, none on the funded account. If you close your entire 10% target in a single session, that's a pass. Your profit pattern is not evaluated — only your risk management is.
If you're a news trader, momentum trader, or anyone who takes fewer but larger positions, this difference alone may determine which firm suits you.
Mandatory Stop-Loss Requirement
HyroTrader requires traders to set a stop-loss on every position within 5 minutes of entering the trade. The stop-loss must also cap the trade risk at a maximum of 3% of initial account balance per position.
This is enforced live. Breach it once and you get a one-time email warning with one hour to fix it. Breach it again — account failed immediately.
The 3% per-trade risk cap is a hard operational constraint. If you trade a $100,000 account, no single position can risk more than $3,000. For traders who size dynamically based on conviction level, this limits flexibility in a way that goes beyond standard drawdown rules.
Velotrade has no mandatory stop-loss requirement. You manage your own risk. The drawdown and daily loss limits are the constraints — not a per-trade position size cap.
Minimum Trading Days
HyroTrader requires 10 minimum trading days per evaluation phase. At least one position must be opened on each of those days.
Velotrade requires 4 qualifying trading days — each with at least 0.5% net profit on the initial account balance.
The practical difference: at HyroTrader, even if you hit your profit target in 5 days, you must continue trading for at least 10 sessions. That extends evaluation timelines and forces additional trades that may not be high-conviction setups.
At Velotrade, the 4-day requirement exists with no overall time limit. If you hit your profit target and your 4 qualifying days in the same period, you pass.
Profit Split: Day One vs Scaled Over Time
HyroTrader's profit split starts at 70% and scales upward by 5% every 4 months — reaching 80% at 4 months, 85% at 8 months, 90% at 12 months.
Velotrade's profit split is up to 90% from the first payout.
The gap in year one is meaningful. On $10,000 profit in the first 4 months: at 70% you take home $7,000; at 90% you take home $9,000. The $2,000 difference represents value you accumulate over time at HyroTrader but receive immediately at Velotrade.
HyroTrader does refund the challenge fee on your first profit split payout, which partially offsets this. Velotrade doesn't offer a fee refund.

Pricing: Side-by-Side Challenge Fees
| Account Size | Velotrade 2-Step | Velotrade 1-Step | HyroTrader 2-Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $60 | $72 | ~$89 |
| $10,000 | $120 | $132 | ~$149 |
| $25,000 | $300 | $330 | ~$299 |
| $50,000 | $540 | $594 | ~$499 |
| $100,000 | $899 | $1,199 | ~$899 |
| $200,000 | $1,549 | $1,679 | ~$999 |
Note: HyroTrader refunds the challenge fee on the first payout. Factor this into cost comparison if you expect to pass.
Platform: dxTrader vs Binance / ByBit via CLEO
Velotrade uses dxTrader — a purpose-built prop trading platform. It's designed for the prop firm evaluation environment and runs independently of retail exchange accounts.
HyroTrader connects traders directly to Binance and ByBit via CLEO integration. This means you're trading on real exchange infrastructure with live order books and real execution.
The CLEO integration has a practical advantage for traders already familiar with Binance or ByBit order types, funding rates, and interface. The dxTrader advantage is in its prop-firm-specific design — rules monitoring, account management, and payout tracking are built in.
Neither is objectively better. It depends on your existing familiarity and preferences.
What Each Firm Suits Best
Choose Velotrade if:
- You trade news events or high-volatility setups where single-day returns matter
- You run high-conviction positions and don't want a per-trade risk cap
- You want 90% profit split from your first payout — not after 12 months
- You prefer fewer required trading days (4 vs 10) and a faster path to a funded account
- You use automated strategies and want no stop-loss placement obligation
- You want crypto-only focus with an institutional-grade founding team background
Choose HyroTrader if:
- You're comfortable with the 10 minimum trading days structure
- The 40% consistency cap doesn't conflict with your strategy (you naturally spread profits)
- You want a refundable challenge fee to reduce the upfront cost
- You trade primarily on Binance or ByBit and prefer native exchange connectivity
- You're content scaling your profit split over time rather than starting at 90%
Both Firms Get Right: Shared Strengths
There are areas where Velotrade and HyroTrader are aligned — and both deserve credit for getting these right compared to older, generalist prop firms:
- Crypto-only focus — neither firm asks you to trade forex or equities
- News trading allowed — both permit trading through scheduled and unscheduled events
- Weekend holding allowed — neither forces position closure on Friday
- EAs and automation permitted — both support algorithmic trading strategies
- No time limit on evaluations — both allow unlimited time to hit profit targets
For context on why these permissions matter, see why traders fail prop challenges — many failures trace back to firms with restrictive rules that force traders out of their natural strategy.

The Stop-Loss Rule: A Detail Most Comparisons Miss
Most HyroTrader vs Velotrade comparisons focus on drawdown and profit split. The mandatory stop-loss requirement at HyroTrader is underreported but operationally significant.
The 5-minute rule means: every time you enter a position, your clock starts. If your entry is during a volatile move — say a CPI print where spreads widen instantly — you have 5 minutes to set a valid stop-loss at 3% or less from your entry. If the market gaps through your intended stop before you set it, you're still required to set one.
For manual traders who manage risk actively, this adds a workflow step that doesn't exist at Velotrade. For algo traders, it requires your system to include SL placement logic as part of every order — not just risk management logic.
At Velotrade, your drawdown limits are the boundaries. How you manage risk within those limits — stop-losses, position sizing, scaling in and out — is your decision.
Which Crypto Prop Firm Is Better?
There's no universal answer. Both firms are legitimate, both allow the strategies that matter for crypto trading, and both have passed traders to funded accounts.
The decision comes down to your trading style:
If you trade for concentrated, high-conviction moves — news events, macro setups, single-session opportunities — Velotrade's no consistency rule and no mandatory SL requirement removes constraints that would directly interfere with your strategy.
If you trade systematically across many sessions and your natural approach spreads profits broadly, HyroTrader's consistency rule may never trigger anyway, and the refundable fee reduces upfront cost.
For a broader view of the crypto prop firm landscape and how other firms compare, see best crypto prop firms in 2026.
To understand how Velotrade's rules work in full — including drawdown mechanics, inactivity rules, and breach consequences — see crypto prop firm rules explained.
Ready to start a Velotrade challenge? View challenge options and pricing →
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Prop firm rules, fees, and structures change frequently — always review each firm's official terms and conditions before making any decisions. This comparison reflects publicly available information as of March 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the author

Vittorio De Angelis
Executive Chairman
Former equity-derivatives trader at JP Morgan, Dresdner Kleinwort and Bank of America in London. Later Head of Brokerage at a global broker in Hong Kong.
View author page