Two low-barrier prop firms. One built for crypto from day one. Here is how they compare where it counts.
DNA Funded and Velotrade both appeal to traders looking for accessible entry into funded crypto trading. DNA Funded markets itself on low challenge cost and broad instrument access. Velotrade takes a narrower, crypto-native position with a cleaner rule set and up to 90% profit split from the first payout. If you are trying to choose between them, this comparison covers every metric that drives funded account outcomes: profit targets, drawdown model, consistency rules, profit split, platform, and pricing. For a broader overview of how both fit into the funded trading landscape, see what a crypto funded trading account actually involves.
Highlights of this article
- Velotrade uses EOD trailing drawdown; DNA Funded's drawdown model needs to be verified directly with the firm before committing
- Velotrade offers up to 90% profit split from the first payout; DNA Funded's base split is reported at up to 90% but with less structural transparency
- DNA Funded runs on MT5 and DXtrade; Velotrade is DXtrade-only
- Velotrade is crypto-native with no consistency rule, news trading allowed, and weekend holding allowed
- DNA Funded has a multi-asset, forex-first product history; crypto coverage is broad but not the architectural focus
- Velotrade's 2-Step challenge starts at $60 for a $5,000 account; DNA Funded is known for competitive low-end pricing
- Both firms allow news trading and weekend holding, with no consistency rule reported
Quick Comparison: DNA Funded vs Velotrade
| Velotrade | DNA Funded | |
|---|---|---|
| Challenge types | 1-Step, 2-Step | 2-Step (standard) |
| Account sizes | $5k to $200k | Up to $600k (across accounts) |
| Phase 1 profit target | 10% | ~10% (confirm with firm) |
| Phase 2 profit target | 5% | ~5% (confirm with firm) |
| Daily loss limit | 5% (2-Step) | Confirm with firm |
| Max drawdown | 10% EOD trailing | Confirm drawdown model directly |
| Min trading days | 4 qualifying days | Confirm with firm |
| Consistency rule | None | None reported |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
| EAs / automation | Allowed | Allowed |
| Platform | DXtrade | MT5, DXtrade |
| Max funding | $200k | Up to $600k (multi-account) |
| Profit split | Up to 90% from day 1 | Up to 90% |
| Challenge fee refund | No | Confirm with firm |
Profit Targets and Drawdown: What the Numbers Actually Mean
On a 2-step challenge, Velotrade sets a 10% Phase 1 profit target and 5% in Phase 2. The maximum drawdown is 10% EOD trailing, with a 5% daily loss limit.
EOD trailing means the high water mark that sets your floor is only recalculated at the end of each trading day. If your account reaches a new equity high intraday but settles below it at close, the floor does not move. This model is materially more forgiving than tick-by-tick trailing drawdowns, which tighten your floor every time unrealised gains touch a new high, even briefly.
For DNA Funded, the widely reported structure also uses a 2-step challenge with broadly similar targets, but the exact drawdown mechanics should be confirmed directly with the firm before purchasing. The distinction between EOD trailing and tick-by-tick trailing is significant enough to affect your funded account risk in a meaningful way.
For a detailed breakdown of how drawdown models affect challenge pass rates and funded account longevity, read crypto prop firm rules and drawdowns explained.
No Consistency Rule: Both Firms Skip It
Consistency rules cap how much of your total evaluation profit can come from a single trading day. A firm that limits any one day to 30% of total profit means a single large trade, even a valid one, can disqualify an otherwise successful evaluation run.
Neither Velotrade nor DNA Funded enforces a consistency rule. At Velotrade, this is explicitly documented. Your profit distribution across days is not evaluated at any stage. Whether your target profit comes from 1 session or 20 does not matter, provided you stay within the drawdown and daily loss limits.
This is especially important for news traders and volatility traders who naturally concentrate returns into fewer, higher-conviction setups. Forcing artificial daily distribution does not reflect how real edge works in crypto markets.
To understand why the consistency rule remains one of the most impactful hidden costs at many prop firms, read crypto prop firms with no consistency rule.
News Trading and Weekend Holding
Both firms allow news trading. This means you can hold positions through scheduled macro events, central bank announcements, and other high-impact data releases without facing rule-based position closure requirements.
Both firms also permit weekend holding. Positions can remain open over the weekend without triggering a breach. For crypto traders running swing trades or multi-day positions across weekends, this is a meaningful structural advantage over firms that force Friday-close position management.
Velotrade's weekend holding policy is clearly documented as part of its core rule set. DNA Funded's policy is consistent with this on reported terms, but should be confirmed directly with the firm before trading through a weekend event.
Platform: MT5 Flexibility vs DXtrade Specialisation
DNA Funded supports MT5 and DXtrade. If you already run a tested setup in MetaTrader 5, including custom indicators, EAs, and risk management scripts built in MQL5, DNA Funded lets you bring that environment directly into the evaluation. There is no learning curve, no indicator migration, and no execution environment adjustment.
Velotrade uses DXtrade exclusively. DXtrade is a purpose-built prop trading platform with native challenge management, rules monitoring, and account performance dashboards integrated at the system level. It was designed specifically for the funded account model, which means the evaluation environment and account management tools are more tightly integrated than in a retail MT5 stack adapted for prop use.
For traders new to DXtrade, there is a short adjustment period. For traders already familiar with it from other firms, the transition is straightforward.
Crypto-Native vs Multi-Asset Architecture
This is the structural difference that matters most for dedicated crypto traders.
Velotrade is built around crypto trading. Its rule design, drawdown calibration, and platform choice are all oriented to 24/7 markets, higher volatility, and crypto-specific liquidity behavior. No forex legacy constraints are inherited.
DNA Funded has a multi-asset, forex-first product history. Crypto coverage is broad and the platform supports it, but the firm's original architecture was built for a different market structure. For traders running exclusively crypto strategies, this is worth considering when evaluating whether rule calibration and risk controls are designed with crypto volatility in mind.
Neither position is inherently disqualifying. But if your entire strategy is built around crypto-specific market behavior, a crypto-native firm is less likely to introduce structural friction through rules calibrated for forex.
For a deeper argument on why this distinction matters for practical outcomes, read why crypto-only prop firms matter.
Profit Split: Up to 90% from Day One
Velotrade offers up to 90% profit split from the first payout. There is no ramp-up schedule, no qualifying period before the top split activates, and no add-on fee required to access it. You pass the challenge, you get funded, you take 90%.
DNA Funded reports up to 90% profit split as well. The specific structure of how and when the top split is accessed, whether it requires a scaling path, additional fees, or period qualification, should be confirmed directly with the firm before purchasing.
On a $10,000 profit withdrawal, the difference between 80% and 90% is $1,000. Over a year of consistent funded trading, that gap compounds materially. The headline percentage is important, but the conditions attached to reaching it are equally important.
Minimum Trading Days
Velotrade requires 4 qualifying trading days to pass the evaluation. Each qualifying day must close with at least 0.5% net profit on the initial account balance. Passing the profit target and completing 4 qualifying days in the same window is all that is required. There is no overall time limit imposed.
DNA Funded's minimum trading day requirements should be verified directly with the firm. Different firms in this category use different definitions of "trading day", ranging from pure attendance (any position opened that day) to minimum profit-per-day conditions. Confirming the definition matters because it affects how many sessions your strategy needs to cover.
Pricing: Side-by-Side Challenge Fees
| Account Size | Velotrade 2-Step | Velotrade 1-Step | DNA Funded 2-Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $60 | $72 | Confirm current pricing |
| $10,000 | $120 | $132 | Confirm current pricing |
| $25,000 | $300 | $330 | Confirm current pricing |
| $50,000 | $540 | $594 | Confirm current pricing |
| $100,000 | $899 | $1,199 | Confirm current pricing |
| $200,000 | $1,549 | $1,679 | Confirm current pricing |
DNA Funded is known for a competitive low-cost pricing model, particularly at smaller account sizes. It is marketed specifically at cost-sensitive traders testing funded workflows. Confirm current pricing on DNA Funded's website before purchasing, as fees can change.
Velotrade pricing is fixed and transparently published. The 1-step option adds a small premium over the 2-step fee in exchange for a single-phase evaluation rather than two.
What Each Firm Suits Best
Choose Velotrade if:
- You want 90% profit split confirmed from the first payout, with no additional fees or scaling requirements
- You want a crypto-native rule set designed for 24/7 volatile markets, not forex-inherited constraints
- You prefer a 1-step challenge option for a faster evaluation path
- You are comfortable with DXtrade and want a purpose-built prop trading environment
- You value explicit rule documentation over loosely communicated terms
Choose DNA Funded if:
- Low challenge cost is your primary filter and you want to test funded workflows with minimal upfront commitment
- You already run a tested MT5 setup and do not want to migrate your tools to DXtrade
- You want higher maximum capital allocation across multiple accounts (up to $600,000)
- You trade across crypto, forex, and other instruments and need broader multi-asset access
- You are a cost-sensitive trader calibrating to a funded account model for the first time
Both Firms Get Right: Shared Strengths
For traders coming from more restrictive prop firm environments, both DNA Funded and Velotrade offer a meaningfully better operating baseline:
- No consistency rule: profit distribution across trading days is not evaluated at either firm
- News trading allowed: both permit trading through macro events and high-impact data releases
- Weekend holding allowed: neither forces position closure on Friday close
- EAs and automation permitted: algorithmic strategies are supported at both firms
- Broad crypto access: both cover major and mid-cap crypto pairs
For context on how each of these permissions affects strategy design and challenge pass rates, see crypto prop firm rules explained.
Which Crypto Prop Firm Is Better?
For traders who want a crypto-native firm with clearly documented rules, transparent drawdown mechanics, and up to 90% profit split from day one, Velotrade is the stronger structural choice. The EOD trailing drawdown is explicitly confirmed, the rule stack is designed for crypto volatility, and there are no ambiguities about how and when the top split applies.
For cost-sensitive traders running MT5 setups who want to test a funded account workflow with low upfront commitment and access to higher capital allocation across multiple accounts, DNA Funded is a practical starting point.
Both decisions are defensible depending on what you are optimizing for. The key is confirming DNA Funded's drawdown mechanics, payout structure, and minimum trading day definitions before paying, since the details at that level determine outcomes more than any headline comparison.
For a full market view of where both firms sit, see best crypto prop firms in 2026. For Velotrade's complete rule set, payout structure, and account details, see Velotrade review 2026. For a step-by-step guide from evaluation to first payout, see how to become a funded crypto trader.
Ready to start a Velotrade challenge? View challenge options and pricing
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Prop firm rules, fees, and structures change frequently. Always review each firm's official terms and conditions before making any decisions. This comparison reflects publicly available information as of March 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the author

Vittorio De Angelis
Executive Chairman
Former equity-derivatives trader at JP Morgan, Dresdner Kleinwort and Bank of America in London. Later Head of Brokerage at a global broker in Hong Kong.
View author page


