Most traders who fail a prop challenge don't fail because they can't trade.
They fail because they misread the rules, took too much risk early, or got tripped up by a restriction they hadn't anticipated: a consistency cap, a mandatory stop-loss, or a drawdown that moves against them when they're profitable.
This guide covers exactly what the 2-step evaluation structure requires, how to approach each phase with a plan, and the specific rule mechanics that catch out even experienced traders.
Highlights of this article
- A 2-step challenge has two phases: Phase 1 targets 10% profit, Phase 2 targets 5%
- The daily loss limit and max drawdown limits apply in both phases, not just when things go wrong
- Qualifying trading days matter: you need at least 4 days with 0.5% net profit each, not just any 4 active days
- No consistency rule means your best single day counts in full. You don't have to spread profits evenly
- News trading and weekend holds are allowed. High-volatility events are opportunities, not obstacles
- Passing faster is possible: if you hit your profit target and 4 qualifying days simultaneously, you pass
What a 2-Step Challenge Actually Is
A 2-step prop challenge is an evaluation process that proves you can trade with discipline before a firm allocates real capital to you. You pay a challenge fee, trade a simulated account with real market conditions, and if you meet the targets in both phases, you receive a funded account.
The 2-step structure exists because it filters out luck. One good phase can be a single day of volatility. Two consecutive phases, with slightly different targets, is harder to fluke.
At Velotrade, the 2-step structure looks like this:
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Funded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit target | 10% | 5% | No target |
| Daily loss limit | 5% of initial balance | 5% of initial balance | 5% of initial balance |
| Max drawdown | 10% (fixed) | 10% (fixed) | 10% (fixed) |
| Min qualifying days | 4 | 4 | 4 per 30-day period |
| Time limit | None | None | None |
| Consistency rule | None | None | None |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
The targets step down: 10% in Phase 1, 5% in Phase 2. But the risk parameters stay the same throughout both phases and carry forward into the funded account. This consistency matters: the rules you learn to work within during the challenge are the same rules you'll operate under once you're funded.
Understanding the Numbers Before You Start
Before your first trade, calculate your hard limits in dollar terms. Trading by percentages without knowing the dollar values is one of the most common setup mistakes.
On a $50,000 2-step account:
| Parameter | % | Dollar amount |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 profit target | 10% | $5,000 |
| Phase 2 profit target | 5% | $2,500 |
| Daily loss limit | 5% | $2,500 |
| Max drawdown (fixed) | 10% | $5,000 |
Know these numbers before you open your platform. Write them down. The daily loss limit is measured on your initial account balance, not your current equity. This is the fixed drawdown model, and it's actually more predictable to trade around than trailing drawdown.
Fixed vs trailing drawdown: why it matters here
A fixed drawdown means your maximum loss threshold is calculated from your starting balance and stays there. If you start at $50,000, your max drawdown limit is $45,000. It does not move.
With trailing drawdown (used by many other prop firms), the limit rises as your equity rises. If you grow your $50,000 account to $55,000, your floor might trail up to $49,500. A normal pullback from a high-water mark can breach the account even though you're still profitable overall.
Fixed drawdown is more forgiving to trade around. You know exactly where your floor is from day one. For the full comparison, see trailing drawdown vs fixed drawdown explained.
The 4 Qualifying Trading Days Rule
This is the rule most misunderstood by traders new to Velotrade's structure.
You need 4 qualifying trading days in each phase. A qualifying trading day is a day where your net profit on the initial account balance reaches at least 0.5%.
On a $50,000 account: 0.5% = $250 net profit on that day.
What this means in practice:
- Days where you trade but finish flat or negative don't count toward your 4
- Days where you make less than 0.5% don't count
- There is no cap on how many total trading days you take. You can take 30 days if needed, as long as at least 4 of them qualify
- You can pass faster: if you hit your 10% profit target and all 4 qualifying days simultaneously, you advance immediately
The qualifying days requirement exists to prevent single-trade passes. A trader who puts on one enormous position and hits the target in a day isn't demonstrating the kind of consistent risk management that leads to long-term funded trading. Four qualifying days with 0.5% each confirms that you can find opportunities across multiple sessions.
Strategy implication: Don't artificially slow down. If you're having a strong run and your qualifying days are stacking up naturally, let the account grow. There's no reward for taking longer.

Phase 1: Targeting 10%
The 10% target is achievable without aggressive position sizing. On a $50,000 account, you're looking for $5,000 net profit.
Position sizing for Phase 1
A disciplined approach: target 1–2% per trade, risk 0.5–1% per trade (based on stop-loss distance, not fixed lot size). At this cadence:
- 5 winning trades at 1% average net = 5% progress
- 10 winning trades at 1% average net = Phase 1 complete
- Even with a 60% win rate and 1:2 risk-reward, you're generating more than you need
The target is not difficult. The challenge is staying within drawdown limits while getting there.
Drawdown discipline in Phase 1
Your daily loss limit is 5% ($2,500 on a $50k account). This is a hard stop for the day. If you hit it, you must stop trading for that session.
Practical rule: Set your own internal daily loss limit at 2–3%. Never take a full 5% daily loss. Why?
Because once you've lost 2.5% in a day, your emotional state changes. Decisions made down 3% are different from decisions made at flat. Professional traders on institutional desks often have internal risk limits at half the stated firm limit for exactly this reason.
The max drawdown of 10% ($5,000 on a $50k account) is measured from your initial balance, not from a new high. You start at $50,000. If your account equity hits $45,000 at any point, the account breaches. This is an equity-based limit, not a closed P&L limit.
Important: The drawdown applies to floating equity, not just closed trades. An open losing position that pushes your equity below the limit breaches the account even if you haven't closed the trade.
News events in Phase 1
At Velotrade there is no news trading ban. Fed decisions, CPI prints, NFP, major protocol announcements: all are tradeable. For traders with a macro edge, scheduled events are among the highest-probability setups of any month.
If you trade news events: size down on entry and wait for the initial spike to settle before adding. News moves are fast and spreads widen. Let the market show its direction before committing full size.
Phase 2: Targeting 5%
Phase 2 is the same rules, smaller target. You start fresh from your initial account balance. Your Phase 1 profits do not carry forward.
The 5% target on a $50,000 account is $2,500. The same daily limits and max drawdown apply.
Common Phase 2 mistake: traders treat Phase 2 as a formality after clearing Phase 1, then get caught by overconfidence. A 5% target can be reached in a few good sessions, or lost in one bad one. Apply the same discipline as Phase 1. The funded account is right there.
No consistency rule means you're not penalised for making $2,000 on a single day out of a $2,500 target. If you have a strong conviction trade that covers 80% of your target in one session, that's a pass waiting to happen. Don't leave it on the table because you're worried about "spreading" your profits evenly.
The No Consistency Rule Advantage
Most prop firms cap any single trading day at a percentage of your total evaluation profit. The standard is 40–50%: if your 10% target is $5,000 on a $50k account, no single day can contribute more than $2,000–$2,500.
Velotrade has no consistency rule at any stage: evaluation or funded.
This matters most for:
News traders: A single well-executed macro trade can contribute 5–8% of a target. With a consistency rule, you'd need to hold back or forfeit part of the gain. Without one, it counts.
Momentum traders: If you catch a strong BTC trend session and run it, you don't have to exit early to stay "consistent."
High-conviction traders: Traders who take fewer but larger positions, sizing based on setup quality rather than spreading evenly, are not penalised for their natural approach.
For a deeper look at why consistency rules exist and what they actually measure, see crypto prop firms with no consistency rule.
Risk Management Framework for the Challenge
You don't need a complex system. You need a few hard rules applied consistently.
Before each session:
- Know your dollar P&L from the open challenge (not just today, total)
- Know how far you are from the daily loss limit in dollar terms
- Know how far you are from the max drawdown in dollar terms
- Have your profit target for the session in mind (even if informal)
Position sizing:
- Risk no more than 1% of initial account balance per trade
- Never have more than 3% at risk across open positions simultaneously
- Size down in high-volatility conditions, not up
Daily loss limit management:
- Hit 2% down: pause and review. Is this a bad day or a bad session?
- Hit 3% down: stop for the day. Protect the remaining drawdown for tomorrow.
- Never use the full 5% daily limit. Once you do, you've used all the buffer.
Weekly review:
- After each week, note which days qualified (≥0.5% net) and which didn't
- Track how much of your profit target remains and how many qualifying days you still need
- Adjust position sizing if you're running ahead or behind plan
Common Mistakes That Fail Prop Challenges
1. Misunderstanding the equity drawdown The drawdown applies to floating equity. Open losing positions count. Many traders breach accounts with profitable overall P&L because one open losing position pushed equity below the limit before they could close it.
2. Overtrading in the first week The early sessions feel like a clean slate. Some traders size up aggressively to "get ahead" on the profit target. This is the fastest way to burn through daily loss limits before you've built any cushion.
3. Ignoring qualifying days Trading every day but only closing small, or negative, sessions means your qualifying day count stalls. You need 4 sessions with at least 0.5% net. Track them explicitly.
4. Not accounting for the overnight fee Velotrade charges a 0.05% overnight funding fee on open positions held past the daily session close. On a $50,000 account with $10,000 of open exposure, that's $5 per night. This is negligible for short holds but meaningful on multi-week positions. Factor it into P&L projections on longer-term trades.
5. Revenge trading after a bad session A 3% down day is a data point, not a verdict. Prop traders who come back the next session with doubled position sizes trying to recover are pattern-matching against the biggest reason funded accounts get blown.
What Happens After You Pass
Once you pass both phases, you receive access to a funded account at the same size as your challenge account. The funded account operates under identical rules to the challenge: same daily loss limit, same max drawdown, same qualifying day requirement (4 per 30-day period to remain active).
Payouts: Velotrade pays up to 90% profit split from the first payout. There is no scaling period. You receive the full split immediately.
Inactivity: The funded account requires at least 4 qualifying trading days per 30-day period. An inactive account is closed. The requirement exists to confirm active trading, not to create pressure.
For the full funded account rule set, see crypto prop firm rules explained.

Choosing the Right Account Size
The challenge fee scales with account size. Larger accounts give you more room to maneuver (daily loss limit and max drawdown in dollar terms are bigger), but the percentage targets are identical.
| Account size | 2-Step fee | Phase 1 target | Daily loss limit | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $60 | $500 | $250 | $500 |
| $10,000 | $120 | $1,000 | $500 | $1,000 |
| $25,000 | $300 | $2,500 | $1,250 | $2,500 |
| $50,000 | $540 | $5,000 | $2,500 | $5,000 |
| $100,000 | $899 | $10,000 | $5,000 | $10,000 |
| $200,000 | $1,549 | $20,000 | $10,000 | $20,000 |
Practical guide: Choose the size where the dollar loss limits feel real but manageable. If $2,500 is a meaningful loss that you'd work hard to avoid, the $50k account creates the right psychological pressure. If $2,500 feels inconsequential to your decision-making, size up.
Not sure how the evaluation process works end-to-end? See how Velotrade works →
The Fastest Path Through a 2-Step Challenge
Ideal scenario: consistent sessions, each clearing 0.5% or more, with drawdown untouched.
Theoretical minimum: 4 qualifying days in Phase 1 (if each averages 2.5% net profit to hit the 10% target), then 4 qualifying days in Phase 2 (averaging 1.25% each to hit 5%). Eight trading days total.
This is aggressive but structurally possible. At Velotrade, the no consistency rule means a single strong day won't disqualify you.
Realistic timeline for most traders: 2–3 weeks per phase. 4–6 weeks total for the full evaluation.
There is no time limit. If you need 3 months, take 3 months. Passing with patience is better than failing in a rush.
Ready to start? View challenge options and pricing →
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Prop firm rules, fees, and structures change frequently. Always review the full terms and conditions before making any decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the author

Vittorio De Angelis
Executive Chairman
Former equity-derivatives trader at JP Morgan, Dresdner Kleinwort and Bank of America in London. Later Head of Brokerage at a global broker in Hong Kong.
View author page


